By: Lee Owston,
National Director Education and Jason
Bradbury
Many schools are facing challenges recruiting and retaining
teachers. It's something Ofsted is critically aware of, and
frequently highlights.
To help tackle this, it's vital that we understand the factors
contributing to these difficulties.
That's why we were happy to support a new study by UCL's Professor
John Jerrim into this topic. Working with Ofsted and the
Department for Education (DfE), Professor Jerrim was able to look
at the school-age characteristics of children who went on to
become teachers.
He looked at children born between September 1994 and August
1995, and was able to explore the characteristics of individuals
who chose to become teachers and whether they subsequently left
teaching.
A better understanding of the characteristics of those most
likely to become and stay teachers can help to inform recruitment
and retention strategies and the development of a diverse
workforce that mirrors the population it serves.
Some of the most significant findings are explored below.
Eligibility for free school meals
Children who were eligible for free school meals (FSM) are
roughly half as likely to enter teaching as those who were not.
It is worth noting that, on average, FSM pupils achieve lower
grades than non-FSM pupils. Professor Jerrim found that, given
the academic requirements of becoming a teacher, most of the gap
in entering teaching can be explained by this difference in
grades achieved.
He also found that teachers from FSM backgrounds are no more or
less likely to leave teaching than their peers.
So, as eligibility for FSM clearly has an impact on the
likelihood of becoming a teacher, improving outcomes for these
pupils remains the most important objective.
Speaking English as an additional language
At first glance, it appears that children who spoke English as an
additional language (EAL) in Year 11 are about as likely to enter
teaching as their peers whose first language is English.
However, once differences in the educational achievements of
these groups have been controlled, EAL pupils are less likely to
become teachers.
To put it another way, young people who speak EAL are less likely
to enter teaching than their equally qualified peers.
Teachers who spoke EAL in Year 11 are also more likely to leave
teaching in the state school sector.
Overall, it seems that EAL pupils who hold the requisite
qualifications to become teachers are still less likely to want
to teach than their non-EAL peers. And those who do become
teachers are more likely to leave. This all suggests that
improving both recruitment and retention of people from an EAL
background could make a real difference.
Living with parents as an undergraduate
Individuals who live with their parents as undergraduates are
more likely to become teachers than their peers who live away
from home. This is true even when they achieve similar school
grades, go to the same university and achieve the same higher
education outcomes.
They are then also less likely to leave teaching (in the state
sector) within the first four years working in the job.
Professor Jerrim suggests that this may indicate that these
teachers have a higher than average:
- preference for staying in their local area
- aversion to risk
- concern for financial security.
The fact that teaching is a possible career no matter where you
live, and that it offers a relatively stable and reliable income,
could be significant in attracting these individuals.
University
Those who study for their undergraduate degree at a Russell Group
university are around 30% less likely to enter teaching than
their peers who study elsewhere, even after accounting for
differences in school grades.
They are also more likely to stop teaching in the state school
sector within the first four years of their career.
Competition from other professions may be pulling away potential
teachers who attended Russell Group universities.
Next steps
This paper is a useful contribution to understanding the
difficulties around teacher recruitment and retention. It
highlights areas where focused recruitment campaigns could help,
and where they are less likely to have an impact.
We hope that this work can be continued and extended.
It could also help Ofsted with our future work. For example, it
could help to inform our inspection framework for initial teacher
training (ITT) providers. And, if the work is extended to other
cohorts, it could be used to establish differences in teacher
retention rates across different ITT providers, and some of the
background reasons why these may occur.
We look forward to future discussion and development of this
critical topic. And we hope it can inform actions to make sure
schools are able to hire and retain high-quality teachers who
provide an excellent education for the next generation.