The Census should not be abandoned before officials address
  long-standing barriers to the sharing of data for statistical and
  research purposes, MPs say today. 
  The recommendation is in a report from the cross-party Public
  Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee published
  today about the UK's evidence
  base.  
  In June 2023, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) launched a
  consultation on its proposals to transform the UK's population
  and migration statistics. The proposals said that "a serious
  question can be asked about the role the census plays in our
  statistical system" and recommended that statisticians in future
  "primarily use administrative data like tax, benefit and border
  data, complemented by survey data and a wider range of data
  sources."  
  These proposals followed an ambition defined by Government in
  2014 that "censuses after 2021 will be conducted using other
  sources of data." 
  However, the Committee's inquiry heard that “concerns remain
  about whether data will be available at the granularity required
  on topics such as ethnicity, and whether data on topics such
  sexual orientation will be available at all.” 
  Despite having a statistical system that is highly regarded
  internationally, the Committee finds that broader opportunities
  to benefit from joined-up data are being missed because of
  long-standing issues with cross-departmental data-sharing. 
  The report states that “it is clear that the volume and variety
  of data generated within the UK has exploded in scale over recent
  years”, while noting “the UK has failed to bring its disparate
  datasets together to enrich its public evidence base. Instead,
  data withers in silos across countless government bodies.” 
  The Committee argues “it is time for Government to do what it
  promised to do seven years ago, and to join up the UK's evidence
  base.” 
  The Committee's report also finds that there are significant data
  gaps so that the UK lacks suitable evidence on, for example, the
  performance of its different health services, and issues such as
  school absenteeism. It recommends that the UK establish a
  framework for identifying and prioritising demands for data, one
  which is rooted in the understanding that evidence is for all,
  rather than for the government of the day. 
  MPs highlight concerns that good evidence is not yet being used
  effectively in decision-making across government, and find that
  government communications too frequently exhibit a disregard for
  evidence, which makes it harder for government to build trust in
  our democracy and support for policies of the day, as well as
  hampering citizens' ability to scrutinise the work of ministers
  and officials. 
  In order to enhance transparency, the report recommends that
  going forward, government should routinely publish the evidence
  and data underpinning their major policy
  announcements.  
  The inquiry took evidence around issues of privacy and the ethics
  involved in the collection and use of data. MPs emphasise that
  the public must be involved in making decisions about how the UK
  chooses to use personal data in the development of its public
  evidence base. 
  PACAC's report also discusses the poor comparability of data
  across the UK. The Committee finds that there are many areas in
  which it is impossible to compare the experiences of those living
  in each of the four nations of the UK. MPs urge the government to
  finalise and publish its plans to improve the comparability of
  UK-wide data without delay. 
  Chair of the Public Administration and Constitutional
  Affairs Committee, Dame , said: 
  “In recent years, we have seen a proliferation in the
  quantity and variety of data available to us and, as the
  committee's inquiry has heard, this provides great opportunities
  for all of us. 
  “However, government has yet to harness these opportunities.
  Data remains locked in departmental silos and there are also
  concerns over significant data gaps. 
  “A key area of our inquiry has been delving into the future
  of the Census, and our report recommends that we should proceed
  with caution when it comes to replacing the Census, until we are
  certain that officials have resolved issues around
  data-sharing.”