Responding to the joint statement released by the Renters' Reform
Coalition, of which the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) is a
member, ahead of the Renters (Reform) Bill's Report Stage and
Third Reading later today (Wednesday) Darren Baxter, Principal Policy Adviser at
JRF, says:
“As it stands the Renters (Reform)
Bill prioritises placating landlords and backbenchers over
strengthening tenants' rights. The Renters' Reform Coalition is
right to highlight the serious inadequacy of the Bill, which has
been repeatedly watered down. While its primary aim has been to
end no-fault evictions, it offers no clear timeframe or
commitment as to when this will be done, reneging on promises
made to renters over five years ago.
“There is still time to do the right
thing. Ministers must table amendments to the Bill that reverse
the delay to ending Section 21 or no-fault evictions. The Bill
must also limit in-tenancy rent increases to the lowest of either
inflation or wage growth to prevent landlords from pricing
tenants out of their homes.”
The full statement from the Renters' Reform Coalition can be
found below.
In its current form, the Renters (Reform) Bill will be a
failure.
The 2019 Conservative Manifesto promised a ‘better deal for
renters' and the government's White Paper promised a private
rented sector “with affordability, security and quality at its
heart.”
We have been clear from the outset that the Renters (Reform) Bill
would have no chance of achieving these aims without significant
changes.
Unfortunately, as groups representing and working alongside
private tenants in England, our concerns have not been taken
seriously. It is revealing that ministers have met with lobbyists
for landlords and estate agents twice as often as they have met
groups representing renters [1].
Instead of engaging with us, the bill has been watered down again
and again by the government, with several rounds of damaging
concessions to backbench MPs that have fundamentally weakened it.
The amendments tabled recently by the government are just the
final straw.
The result of all the government's backtracking is that we have
now have a bill that abolishes section 21 in name only – there is
no guarantee it would ever fully abolish section 21, and even
then the new tenancy system set to replace it will be little
better. This legislation is intended to give the impression of
improving conditions for renters, but in fact it preserves the
central power imbalance at the root of why renting in England is
in crisis.
That crisis summarised: tenants face constant insecurity, with
more than a quarter of all private renters having lived in three
or more private rented homes in the previous five years [2], and
average tenancy lengths well below other European countries. Poor
conditions are also rife, with 22% of privately renting
households reporting avoiding making complaints for fear of being
evicted [3]. This fear is not unfounded, with a shocking 46% of
those who complain about conditions receiving a section 21 notice
within 6 months [4]. Meanwhile, a lack of affordability is
plaguing renters, with large numbers of households on low incomes
being charged rents they cannot afford, without access to
alternative housing options. The result is record numbers of
people being made homeless, and an increasingly untenable
financial strain on local authorities due to the number of
households trapped in temporary accommodation.
To the renters we represent and work alongside we say: in its
current form this bill isn't the change we have been promised,
the change that might start to tackle this crisis in private
renting.
It is not too late to fix it. We are calling on ministers to
immediately table amendments that enact our proposals.
If we do not see a change in this government's approach, it will
fall to whoever forms the next government to introduce the change
that renters demand and so desperately need.
The RRC sets out the following conditions to give our full
support for a package of rental reforms:
• Reversing the concessions to the Bill made to backbench MPs
which see the end of section 21 delayed indefinitely, trapping
tenants into tenancy for 6 months, and reviewing selective
licensing to reduce the burden on landlords.
• Giving tenants 4 months' notice when they are evicted, rather
than 2 months' notice proposed at present (and which is the same
as the status quo for section 21 evictions).
• Protecting renters from eviction under the new landlord
circumstances grounds for the first two years of a tenancy,
rather than the 6 months proposed which offers no improvement on
the status quo.
• Implementing strong safeguards to prevent unscrupulous
landlords abusing the new grounds for eviction, which risk being
used in essentially the same way as section 21 notices.
• Giving courts maximum discretion to identify if there are good
reasons why an eviction should not take place.
• Limiting in-tenancy rent increases at the lowest of either
inflation or wage growth, to prevent unaffordable rent increases
being no-fault ‘economic' evictions.
Notes to Editor
-
Ministers Met Landlords Twice
As Often As Tenants' Groups Over Renters' Reform Bill
(politicshome.com)
-
Every seven minutes a private
renter is served a no-fault eviction notice despite government
promise to scrap them three years ago - Shelter
England
-
English Housing Survey 2021 to
2022: headline report - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
-
Nearly half of tenants who
make complaint face 'revenge eviction' | Renting property | The
Guardian