Just 2 per cent of total transport budget is spent on
infrastructure to support active travel, IPPR
finds
Less than one in five people walk, wheel or cycle every
day, compared to more than one in four across
Europe
London gets £24 per head of investment in
active travel, compared to £10 per head in the rest of
England
£35 per head per year for a decade is needed to deliver
walking, wheeling and cycling
infrastructure
Chronic underfunding of active travel
across England is undermining efforts to get people walking,
wheeling and cycling, instead of driving, according to a new
report from IPPR. This failure has locked in more congestion and
contributed to worsening air quality, making it harder to reduce
emissions while also stifling local growth, the report
says.
The UK lags behind its European
counterparts, with fewer than one in five people walking,
wheeling or cycling on an average day compared to more than one
in four across Europe.
Disparities in active travel spending
have also led to an investment gap equivalent to £2.3bn between
London and the rest of England over a five-year period. London
spent the equivalent of £24 per head per year between 2016 and
2021, while the rest of the country spent the equivalent of only
£10 per head, the IPPR report finds.
However, even London’s spend on active
travel is far below what is needed, IPPR says. Investment in
active travel has historically been low across all of England,
accounting for just 2 per cent of the total transport spend,
leading to some of the lowest walking, wheeling and cycling rates
in Europe.
Spending on active travel in England
pales in comparison to the amounts spent on roads. In the 2016 to
2021 period, an average
of £148 per person per year was spent on roads, over 10 times the
amount spent on facilitating active travel
across the
country.
Funding for active travel schemes
faces an uncertain future. Recently, the already low level of
dedicated funding was
cut by £233 million and the rhetoric surrounding the government’s new “plan
for drivers” has clearly signalled that promoting active travel
is no longer considered the priority it once
was.
The report makes the case that
investing in active travel to increase journeys made by walking,
wheeling and cycling has health, climate and wellbeing benefits
and also offers a way to create green jobs, boost the economy and
deliver safer streets.
-
Shifting short journeys from cars to
active travel would save the NHS £17 billion over 20 years
through improved health and
wellbeing
-
For every £1 spent on active travel
infrastructure, there is an average return on investment of
£5.62, compared to just £2.50 for
roads
-
Doubling cycling and increasing
walking as alternatives to car transport would prevent 8,300
premature deaths and save £567 million per year though improved
air quality
-
Reducing car miles by 25 per cent, a
requirement for meeting the UK’s 2030 climate commitments,
relies on cycling levels increasing by at least 20 per cent
within the decade.
In order to gain the economic, health
and environmental benefits of active travel, IPPR is proposing a
new funding settlement:
-
Investing £35 per person per
year for a decade on active travel
infrastructure,
including delivering at least 25,000 miles of protected cycle
paths
-
Investing a further £15 per
person per year for a decade on interventions to change
behaviour, such as
training for cyclists, incentives to increase access to
bicycles, and loans of e-bikes
-
Active travel funds should
be allocated as part of
single-pot,
long-term funding settlements to local and regional
authorities.
Maya Singer Hobbs, senior
research fellow at IPPR,
said:
“Cycling in the UK peaked 75 years
ago. Since then, UK government policy has locked in car
dependency, making people walk wary and cycle cautious, at the
expense of our health, our environment and our
economy.
“Investment in active travel
infrastructure to get more people walking and wheeling is crucial
to cutting emissions and improving
growth.”
Stephen Frost, principal
research fellow at IPPR,
said:
“This research reveals what could
be achieved if all the warm words from government about the value
of walking, wheeling and cycling were matched with investment.
Diverting just a small percentage of the billions invested by the
government in car travel could make our streets safer for
everyone travelling under their own
steam.
“Children could move around more
freely, we’d all have better access to green space and nature,
people would be healthier and less isolated and local high
streets could be thriving. All this while also moving us closer
to achieving the UK’s legally-binding climate commitments. Active
travel is among the safest investments in transport - a future UK
government must put its money in the right place.”